Assignment 3: Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Insufficiently created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Partially created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Satisfactorily created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Thoroughly created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Did not complete or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Insufficiently determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Partially determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Satisfactorily determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Thoroughly determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Insufficiently selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Partially selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Satisfactorily selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

Thoroughly selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

Insufficiently explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

Partially explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

Satisfactorily explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

Thoroughly explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present