The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Before any scientific evidence can be used in court, including what we commonly refer to as forensic evidence, the court must determine whether that evidence is admissible. In 1923, in Frye v. United States, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia established what came to be known as the Frye standard. The Frye standard held that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only where the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific community.
Seventy years later, in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the Court of the United States held that the Federal Rules of Evidence superseded the Frye standard as the standard of admissibility. Some states, however, still follow the Frye standard.
After reviewing the required materials and conducting your own independent research into the relevant issues below by reviewing law review articles, treatises, and related cases using Westlaw in the Ashford University Library or another legal research site. Try looking in Legal Search Engines, Directories, and Other Research Tools in the Southern Illinois University School of Law Library, which has links to numerous legal research sites.
The Legal Issues Analysis paper must include the following elements:
Discuss the current legal standard for introduction of scientific evidence.
Review the history of the standard.
Compare and analyze the Daubert standard, the Frye standard, and Rule 702.
Discuss whether your state uses the Daubert standard or the Frye standard.
Evaluate whether Daubert or Frye is the more appropriate standard.
Evaluate the current standard. Is it satisfactory? If yes, why? If no, what would be a better standard?
The Legal Issues Analysis paper
Must be approximately 1,000 words (approximately four double-spaced pages in length not including title and references pages), and formatted according to
as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must use at least two credible sources in addition to the course text and the other required materials (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Frye v. United States, and Rule 702 – Testimony by Expert Witness).
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more