The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Case 6-4 Anjoorian et al.: Third-Party Liability
1. Analyze the potential for legal liability of P&T under each of the four basic theories of liabilities discussed in Chapter 6.
2. Were the auditors guilty of professional negligence? Explain.
3. Judge Silverstein relied on the Restatement (Second) of the Law of Torts for his ruling. Assume he had relied on the “near-privity relationship” ruling in Credit Alliance, and evaluate the legal liability of the auditors using that standard.
4. The defendants argued in the case that, in order to find a duty to third parties, an accountant must have contemplated a specific transaction for which the financial statement would be used and that no such transaction was contemplated here. Do you agree with this statements from the perspective of auditors’ third party liability? Why or why not?
Summary:2
Please read the assigned case, answer the questions in the textbook, and create one multiple choice question (no true/false accepted) with four answer choices. Include the correct answer.
Case 7-1 Nortel Networks
1. Describe each of the financial shenanigans used by Nortel and how they manipulated earnings.
2. What were the motivating factors that led to the fraud at Nortel? How should the auditors have considered these factors and the culture at Nortel in its risk assessment?
3. Assume you had to prepare an assessment of internal control over financial reporting at Nortel, what would your conclusion be and why?
4. Does it appear from the facts of the case that the Deloitte auditors met their ethical and professional responsibilities in the audit of Nortel’s financial statements? Be specific.
Summary:3
Please read the assigned case, answer the questions in the textbook, and create one multiple choice question (no true/false accepted) with four answer choices. Include the correct answer.
Case 8-4 Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc.
1. How was mismanagement at Krispy Kreme reflective of leadership failure?
2. Describe the financial shenanigans used by Krispy Kreme. In this regard, is earnings management always a sign of failed leadership?
3. PwC had been Krispy Kreme’s auditor since 1992. How can a firm’s length of service influence audit decisions? What biases may creep up over time? Does it seem this occurred at PwC?
4. One of the reasons behind Krispy Kreme’s financial shenanigans was its failure to meet earnings guidance. How might earnings guidance and the choice of non-GAAP measures reflect a particular style of leadership?
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more