The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Points: 100
Assignment 1: Designing FERPA Technical Safeguards
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze proper physical access control safeguards and provide sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Weight: 21%
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed proper physical access control safeguards and did not submit or incompletely provided sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Insufficientlyanalyzed proper physical access control safeguards and insufficientlyprovided sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Partially analyzed proper physical access control safeguards and partially provided sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Satisfactorilyanalyzed proper physical access control safeguards and satisfactorilyprovided sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Thoroughlyanalyzed proper physical access control safeguards and thoroughlyprovided sound recommendations to be employed in the registrar’s office.
2. Recommend the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Weight: 21%
Did not submit or incompletelyrecommended the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Insufficiently recommended the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Partially recommended the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Satisfactorily recommended the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
Thoroughly recommended the proper audit controls to be employed in the registrar’s office.
3. Suggest three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and explain why you suggested each method.
Weight: 21%
Did not submit or incompletelysuggested three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and did not submit or incompletely explained why you suggested each method.
Insufficiently suggested three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and insufficiently explained why you suggested each method.
Partially suggested three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and partially explained why you suggested each method.
Satisfactorily suggested three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and satisfactorily explained why you suggested each method.
Thoroughly suggested three (3) logical access control methods to restrict unauthorized entities from accessing sensitive information, and thoroughly explained why you suggested each method.
4. Analyze the means in which data moves within the organization and identify techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
Weight: 21%
Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed the means in which data moves within the organization and did not submit or incompletely identified techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
Insufficiently analyzed the means in which data moves within the organization and insufficiently identified techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
Partially analyzed the means in which data moves within the organization and partially identified techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
Satisfactorily analyzed the means in which data moves within the organization and satisfactorily identified techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
Thoroughly analyzed the means in which data moves within the organization and thoroughly identified techniques that may be used to provide transmission security safeguards.
5. 3 references
Weight: 6%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more