The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Assignment 1: LensCrafters Case Study
Due Week 4 and worth 250 points
This assignment requires student complete an analysis of the LensCrafters case from Chapter 6 of the text.
Write a six to seven (6-7) page paper in which you: Minimum Word Requirement is 1800 words.
You are required to submit your essay for plagiarism. To do so, a Turnitin Icon is presented in the Week 4 Area.
To do so, click on the Turnitin Icon presented in the Week 4 Area and follow the instructions. If your essay records a Similarity Score above 25%; revise your work to include the citations and references that reflect the quoted and paraphrased material and resubmit to Turnitin.
I will not accept an essay with a Similarity Score above 25%.
Note: I will not accept an assignment submitted without Level 2 Headings and the minimum word requirement met.
Please use the following Level 2 Headings in your assignment essay. Each Level 2 Heading is reflective of a requirement noted in the assignment.
1. First Level 2 Heading: Evaluate Lens Crafters’ operations strategy and explain how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability.
2. Second Level 2 Heading: Analyze how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Select two (2) operation management challenges and provide the solutions for confronting them.
3. Third Level 2 Heading: Examine Lens Crafters’ value chain and evaluate its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction.
4. Fourth Level 2 Heading: Determine the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure Lens Crafters’ service-delivery system design. Select at least two (2) types that can be applied and provide justifications for the selection.
5. Fifth Level 2 Heading: Examine the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations and evaluate how the technologies strengthen the value chain.
Please note Level 2 Heading, Title Page information and References are not included in meeting the minimum word requirement.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Apply the concept of operations management.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Compare and contrast the difference between a supply chain and a value chain.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Analyze the types of measures used for decision making.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Analyze the five key competitive priorities and their relationship to operations strategy.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Analyze different types of technology and their role in manufacturing and service operations.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Use technology and information resources to research issues in operations management.
•&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ;&νβσπ; Write clearly and concisely about operations management using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 250 |
Assignment 1: LensCrafters Case Study |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Evaluate LensCrafters’ operations strategy and explain how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated LensCrafters’ operations strategy; Did not submit or incompletely explained how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. |
Insufficiently evaluated LensCrafters’ operations strategy; Insufficiently explained how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. |
Partially evaluated LensCrafters’ operations strategy; Partially explained how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. |
Satisfactorily evaluated LensCrafters’ operations strategy; Satisfactorily explained how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. |
Thoroughly evaluated LensCrafters’ operations strategy; Thoroughly explained how the organization seeks to gain a competitive advantage in terms of sustainability. |
|
2. Analyze how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Select two (2) operation management challenges and provide the solutions for confronting them. |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Did not submit or incompletely selected two (2) operation management challenges; Did not submit or incompletely provided the solutions for confronting them. |
Insufficiently analyzed how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Insufficiently selected two (2) operation management challenges; Insufficiently provided the solutions for confronting them. |
Partially analyzed how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Partially selected two (2) operation management challenges; Partially provided the solutions for confronting them. |
Satisfactorily analyzed how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Satisfactorily selected two (2) operation management challenges; Satisfactorily provided the solutions for confronting them. |
Thoroughly analyzed how operation management activities affect the customer experience. Thoroughly selected two (2) operation management challenges; Thoroughly provided the solutions for confronting them. |
|
3. Examine LensCrafters’ value chain and evaluate its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined LensCrafters’ value chain; Did not submit or incompletely evaluated its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. |
Insufficiently examined LensCrafters’ value chain; Insufficiently evaluated its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. |
Partially examined LensCrafters’ value chain; Partially evaluated its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. |
Satisfactorily examined LensCrafters’ value chain; Satisfactorily evaluated its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. |
Thoroughly examined LensCrafters’ value chain; Thoroughly evaluated its effectiveness to operations in terms of quality, value creation, and customer satisfaction. |
|
4. Determine the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Select at least two (2) types that can be applied and provide justifications for the selection. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Did not submit or incompletely selected at least two (2) types that can be applied; Did not submit or incompletely provided justifications for the selection. |
Insufficiently determined the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Insufficiently selected at least two (2) types that can be applied; Insufficiently provided justifications for the selection. |
Partially determined the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Partially selected at least two (2) types that can be applied; Partially provided justifications for the selection. |
Satisfactorily determined the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Satisfactorily selected at least two (2) types that can be applied; Satisfactorily provided justifications for the selection. |
Thoroughly determined the different types of performance measurements that can be used to measure LensCrafters’ service-delivery system design. Thoroughly selected at least two (2) types that can be applied; Thoroughly provided justifications for the selection. |
|
5. Examine the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations and evaluate how the technologies strengthen the value chain. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations; Did not submit or incompletely evaluated how the technologies strengthen the value chain. |
Insufficiently examined the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations; Insufficiently evaluated how the technologies strengthen the value chain. |
Partially examined the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations; Partially evaluated how the technologies strengthen the value chain. |
Satisfactorily examined the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations; Satisfactorily evaluated how the technologies strengthen the value chain. |
Thoroughly examined the different types of technologies applied to LensCrafters’ service operations; Thoroughly evaluated how the technologies strengthen the value chain. |
|
6. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more