The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Introduction
The first two steps in evidence-based practice are to identify knowledge gaps and formulate relevant questions. In this writing exercise, you will be doing just that, across three types of inductive reasoning. In addition, you will be applying evaluation techniques to determine how credible, authoritative, and reliable the arguments are.
Scenario
Imagine your boss has asked you to evaluate four ideas that she is thinking of using to implement programs. You must evaluate whether these are good ideas that she can safely and immediately green-light or whether further evidence is needed. She is anxious to move forward, so she will be unhappy if you reject a good idea; however, if you approve a bad idea, she will be equally as unhappy. She has specifically directed you not to do any outside research. You must evaluate the ideas strictly on the brief passages available. She also wants to know what specific kind of reasoning is used in each passage
Using everything you have learned from the text, as well as any other information you have gathered from your searches related to this week’s discussion, evaluate the following four arguments:
(S
EE ATTACHED DOCUMENT)
Chapter 8 Exercise 8.9 Examples 7 and 10
Chapter 9 Exercise 9.9 Example 1
Chapter 10 Exercise 10.9 Example 1
For each exercise, address the following:
Identify the type of inductive argument and any features of the way the argument is constructed that you find relevant.
Explain how convincing you think the argument is.
Does it have sufficient evidence to allow you to suggest that she move forward with the idea or does the argument have knowledge gaps?
What questions need to be answered to close these gaps?
Does the argument contain any information that adds to its authority, credibility, or reliability?
You need to show your boss that you know what factors have to be considered in evaluating each type of argument and how well the argument meets the criteria.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 100-150 words
per exercise
(not including title page or references page)
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
References page
Grading
This activity will be graded using the Argument Analysis (W6) Grading Rubric.
Argument Analysis (W6) Grading Rubric – 75 pts
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
CriteriaRatingsPts
Edit criterion description
Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Submission _6150
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit rating
Delete rating
7.0 to >0.0 pts
Assignment submitted by due date
_1534
0.0 to >0 pts
Assignment not submitted by due date
_7251
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/ 7.0 pts
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExercise Identification _8559
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Type of argument correctly identified for all 4 exercises.
_8707
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Type of argument correctly identified for 3 exercises.
_2731
10.0 to >5.0 pts
Type of argument correctly identified for 2 exercises.
_4218
5.0 to >0.0 pts
Type of argument correctly identified 1 exercise.
_5474
None are correct, fully developed, or present.
_3401
/ 20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of Criteria _4675
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Evaluates argument according to correct criteria for that type of argument for all 4 exercises.
_9580
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Evaluates argument according to correct criteria for that type of argument for 3 exercises.
_5494
6.0 to >3.0 pts
Evaluates argument according to correct criteria for that type of argument for 2 exercises.
_4931
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Evaluates argument according to correct criteria for that type of argument for 1 exercise.
_3572
_1305
/ 12.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValue of Evidence _8912
Provides full discussion of probative value of evidence (strength of evidence) for all 4 exercises.
_472
Provides full discussion of probative value of evidence (strength of evidence) for 3 exercises.
_1684
Provides full discussion of probative value of evidence (strength of evidence) for 2 exercises.
_7240
Provides full discussion of probative value of evidence (strength of evidence) for 1 exercise.
_6233
_6466
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestions _4233
Forms pertinent question to fill information gaps for all 4 exercises.
_8473
Forms pertinent question to fill information gaps for 3 exercises.
_8677
Forms pertinent question to fill information gaps for 2 exercises.
_4065
Forms pertinent question to fill information gaps for 1 exercises.
_9267
_5660
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAuthority, Credibility, Reliability _7600
Full discussion of authority, credibility and reliability of passage for all 4 exercises.
_534
Full discussion of authority, credibility and reliability of passage for 3 exercises.
_1983
Full discussion of authority, credibility and reliability of passage for 2 exercises.
_448
Full discussion of authority, credibility and reliability of passage for 1 exercises.
_5632
_685
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
/ 5 pts
Total Points: 75.0
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more