The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Fiinal Project (35%)
In the final project, the saga of Joseph Dunn’s leadership at Dunn’s Ski Emporium and The Deli continues. Students will analyze a case study and then write a consultancy report applying concepts and ideas learned throughout the course. Students are expected to effectively use a wide range of the course readings in completing the paper, which means the course readings are used to support ideas and reasoning rather than as stand-alone statements.
Note: A report is not written like a paper. Please use the Outline for the Consultancy Report
The purpose of this project is two-fold. First, students will learn how to write a consultancy report and second, students will link the concepts of Dunn as a social architect, change agent, and individual to Dunn as a relationship builder. Think of a relationship builder as a leader who aligns people to his or her vision.
Students will act as a consultant hired to help Dunn address his role as a relationship builder. Interface the plan you created in Assignment #1- The Role of a Leader, with a plan for Dunn’s need to address the potential threats to workforce harmony. Emphasize his role as leader and what he can do to build his relationship with his employees so that he empowers his managers and workforce to implement his vision for the company. Students are expected to be realistic in applying the concepts from the course to expand Dunn’s environment and leadership role.
Remember that in order to determine strategic direction, the leader must look inward, outward, forward and beyond.
In writing this paper, it is necessary to perform an analysis in terms of how and why Dunn will take a certain course of action related to the questions below. Students are not covering the topics superficially but are required to use the course readings to explain the detail:
Students will create a Consultancy Report:
Required Formatting of the Consultancy Report:
Criteria | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions |
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions |
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion |
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions |
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims |
|
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts |
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts |
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material |
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material |
arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas |
|
demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment |
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment |
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment |
failed to show a firm understanding of requirement; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment |
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements |
|
writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability |
most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues |
wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar |
unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues |
largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure |
|
attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present |
attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document |
attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other |
|||
Overall Score |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more