The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Reflect in ePortfolio Download Print Open with docReader
Module Seven Short Response Guidelines and
Rubric
HIS 200 Module Seven Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The short response activities in the webtext throughout this course are designed to show your understanding of key concepts as you engage
with course content.
Prompt
During the seventh week of the course, you will respond to several questions in the webtext as you complete each learning block. At the end of
Module Seven, you will review your answers to these questions and ensure that you have responded to each question. It is important that you
answer each question; otherwise, the words “[no response]” will appear in brackets when you submit the assignment. The questions and their
original locations in the webtext are listed in this table in case you want to refer back to the reading as you edit, but you can edit your
responses to all the questions directly in Module Seven: Thinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtextModule Seven: Thinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtext, before
exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in your learning environment.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-1 (page 2): Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-1 (page 2):
Question 1Question 1: Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white
settlers.
Question 2Question 2: Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and
white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-2 (page 2): Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-2 (page 2):
Question 3Question 3: Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw.
Question 4Question 4: Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one
or two.)
Question 5Question 5: Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the
Pilgrims.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-3 (page 3): Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-3 (page 3):
Question 6:Question 6: How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance
of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it.
Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-4 (page 2): Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-4 (page 2):
Question 7Question 7: Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this
event for each lens that you cite.
Question 8Question 8: Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: “The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was
correct to oppose it.” Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
What to Submit
Your response to Question 1 should be no more than 1 sentence in length. Your responses to Questions 2, 6, 7, and 8 should be 2–3 sentences
in length. Your responses to Questions 3, 4, and 5 should be 1–2 sentences in length. Follow the instructions at the bottom of Module Seven:Module Seven:
Thinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtextThinking About History, learning block 7-4 (page 4) in the webtext, to download your work and submit it to your instructor as a single
Microsoft Word document uploaded to your learning environment. Refer to the Submitting Webtext Assignments Guide for assistance on
downloading, saving, and submitting this
Module Seven Short Response Rubric
CriteriaCriteria ExemplaryExemplary Proficient Proficient
NeedsNeeds
ImprovementImprovement
Not EvidentNot Evident ValueValue
EngagementEngagement Written responses
completely address
all short answer
prompts (100%)
Written responses
completely address
the majority of short
answer
prompts (85%)
Written responses
address the minority
of short answer
prompts (55%)
No written responses
provided to address
any short answer
prompts (0%)
30
RelevanceRelevance N/A Written responses
directly address short
answer prompts,
drawing from
presented course
concepts and
terminology (100%)
Written responses
are topically related
to short answer
prompts, but
responses do not
consistently draw
from presented
course concepts and
terminology (85%)
Written responses do
not address topics
identified in short
answer prompts (0%)
20
AccuracyAccuracy Written responses
are completely
accurate (100%)
Written responses
contain minor errors
but are mostly
accurate (85%)
Written responses
contain major
errors (55%)
No written responses
are provided (0%)
20
Critical Thinking Critical Thinking N/A Written responses
demonstrate
understanding of
course content
through inclusion of
original ideas and
examples (100%)
Written responses
demonstrate
understanding of
course content
through reiteration of
provided materials,
but do not
consistently include
original ideas and
examples (85%)
Written responses do
not reflect original
ideas and
examples (0%)
20
Articulation ofArticulation of
Response Response
N/A Written responses
are captured in
complete sentences
without grammatical
errors impacting
legibility and the
clarity of
response (100%)
Written responses
are captured in
incomplete sentences
or include numerous
grammatical errors
that negatively
impact legibility and
the clarity of
response (85%)
No written responses
are captured in
complete
sentences (0%)
10
Total:Total: 100%
!Listen”#$
You have viewed this topic
Last Visited Oct 9, 2023 10:26 PM
HIS-200-H1819 Applied History 23EW1 Christopher Middleton
mySNHU Online Student Services Shapiro Library Academic SupportCourse Menu Tools Help
Table of Contents Assignment Information Module Seven Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
Activity Details
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more