The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
IM-1
IAW TP 350-70-7 Appendix C Assessment Instruments
IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments
IAW TP 350-70-7 appendix C Assessment Instruments
NAME:
ASSIGNMENT TITLE: DATE:
FACILITATOR:
RATING UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
RANGE 0 – 69.9 70 – 89.9 90 – 100
GRADE
COGNATIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels.
ANALYZING: Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how
the parts relate to each other and to an overall structure or
purpose through differentiating, organizing, and
attributing.
APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or
implementing.
UNDERSTANDING: Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic
messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying,
summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.
REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge
from long-term memory.
Writing Assignment
Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your analytical essay.
Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain how the principles of
mission command were utilized. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic.
Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully
using no less than 3 full pages and no more than 5 pages, this does not include the title, abstract and
references page. Finally, provide a conclusion. Provide a minimum of two references for your
references page. Ensure you use Times New Roman 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style.
Facilitator’s Comments:
Facilitator’s Signature:
Learner’s Comments:
Learner’s Signature:
deidra.s.manning
Cross-Out
IM-2
US ARMY SERGEANTS MAJOR ACADEMY
Senior Leader Course
Common Core
Form 1009W, Assessing Writing
INTRODUCTION 10%
Unsatisfactory
0-6.9 pts.
Satisfactory
7-8.9 pts.
Superior
9-10 pts.
Does not adequately convey topic.
Does not describe subtopics to be
reviewed. Does not support thesis
statement.
Conveys topic, describes
subtopics to be reviewed.
Generally supports Statement.
Strong introduction of topic clearly
delineates subtopics to be
reviewed. Fully supports thesis
statement.
points for introduction
TOPIC BODY 40%
Unsatisfactory
0-27 pts.
Satisfactory
28-35 pts.
Superior
35-40 pts.
Did not introduce any aspect of the
topic or any instances were so
vague as to imply there was much
more information needed. Made
little attempt to correlate the topic
to the overarching theme. The
body is less than three pages.
Partially introduced some of
aspects of the topic. Developed
and linked the topic to the
overarching theme. The body
meets 3-5 pages requirement.
Solidly introduced all aspects of
the topic preparedness. Fully
linked the topic to the overarching
theme. The body meets 3-5 pages
requirement.
points for body
SEQUENCING AND TRANSITION 10%
Unsatisfactory
0-6 pts.
Satisfactory
7-8 pts.
Superior
9-10 pts.
Little evidence material is
logically organized into topic,
subtopics or related to topic.
Many transitions are unclear or
nonexistent.
Most material clearly related to
main topic and subtopic. Material
may not be organized within
subtopics. Attempts to provide
variety of transitions.
Strong organization and
integration of material within
subtopics. Strong transitions
linking subtopics, and main topic.
points for sequencing and transition
GRAMMAR AND CORRECTNESS 10%
Unsatisfactory
0-6 pts.
Satisfactory
7-8 pts.
Superior
9-10 pts.
Grammatical errors or spelling
& punctuation substantially
detract from the paper.
Very few grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors interfere with
reading the paper.
The paper is free of grammatical
errors and spelling & punctuation.
points for grammar and correctness
READABILITY (sentence structure) 10%
Unsatisfactory
0-6 pts.
Satisfactory
7-8 pts.
Superior
9-10 pts.
Word choice is informal in tone.
Writing is choppy, with many
awkward or unclear passages.
Writing has minimal awkward or
unclear passages.
Writing flows and is easy to
follow.
points for readability
APA FORMATTING 10%
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more