The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Physician profiling is a collection of provider-specific and practice-level data used to analyze physician practice patterns, utilization of services, and outcomes of care. Physician report cards (which may be a component of a physician profile) compare physicians on outcomes related to measures such as quality, patient satisfaction, and cost-utilization patterns.
In this Discussion, you will identify three strategies for improving physician quality practice ranking on physician profiling and quality report cards. Be sure to justify your recommendations.
To prepare:
Review the Learning Resources as they relate to quality-improvement assessment and health care quality outcomes
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Post an analysis of physician quality practice data. Then, recommend three strategies for improving physician quality practice rankings on physician profiling and quality report cards. Justify your recommendations with references to your Learning Resources or other academic resources.
Support your response by identifying and explaining key points and/or examples presented in the Learning Resources.
Resources:
Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Chapter 7, “Physician and Provider Profiling” (pp. 175–190)
Chapter 9, “Measuring and Improving Patient Experiences of Care” (pp. 209–239)
Byrnes, J. (2014). Using the board quality committee to drive the value proposition. Healthcare Financial Management, 68(8), 92–93.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Payne, J., & Leiter, J. (2013). Structuring agency: Examining healthcare management in the USA and Australia using organizational theory. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(1), 106–112.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
ACC/AHA/AACVPR/AAFP/ANA Concepts for clinician — Patient shared accountability in performance measures: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures by Peterson, E. D., Ho, P. M., Barton, M., Beam, C., Burgess, L.H., Casey, D. E., Jr.,… Stanko, S. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64(20), 2133–2145. Copyright 2014 by Elsevier Health Science Journals. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Science Journals via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Professional pointers. (2015). Healthcare Executive, 30(1), 48–49.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more