The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Assignment 1: Stories of Change
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Using Kotter’s model, identify the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and describe the ramifications of those mistakes.
Weight: 25%
Using Kotter’s model, did not submit or incompletely identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.
Using Kotter’s model, partially identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.
Using Kotter’s model, satisfactorily identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.
Using Kotter’s model, thoroughly identified the three (3) most significant errors made out of all of the change stories presented and described the ramifications of those mistakes.
2. Make at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explain why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.
Partially made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.
Satisfactorily made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.
Thoroughly made at least one (1) recommendation for each change story that would have improved the effectiveness of the change process and explained why that recommendation would have altered the outcome of the change process.
3. Attribute a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provide an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.
Partially attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.
Satisfactorily attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.
Thoroughly attributed a change image to the leading managers or directors in each change story and provided an explanation as to why that change image label is appropriate.
4. Recommend a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provide a justification for your recommended strategy.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy.
Partially recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy
Satisfactorily recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy
Thoroughly recommended a different strategy for managing change in each of the one change stories presented and provided a justification for your recommended strategy
5. 3 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
5-6 errors present
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more