The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Read the information and the questions that follow. Identify the legal issue(s) and apply legal concepts and possible arguments for each question. Prepare a solution for each question using laws, cases, examples and other relevant scholarly materials. At the end of the paper, identify potential ethical issues and propose a solution for each issue. Support your answers with information from the textbook and at least two outside scholarly sources. By Saturday, April 25, 2015, prepare a 5 to 8 page paper that identifies the legal issues and potential solutions and answers all questions presented, supported by relevant legal authority. Properly cite all sources using APA format.
This assignment requires application of the concepts learned in Weeks 1–3 and is worth significantly more than previous assignments.
Scenario
Chuck House was the Facilities Director at the headquarters of Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) for 25 years before taking early retirement in 2012. As the Director, Chuck had experience with a variety of functions, including mechanical, electrical, HVAC, carpentry and more. After retiring, Chuck moved to Florida and purchased a condo on the beach. A year later, Chuck was bored, so he decided to start a facilities maintenance business with his friend, Ben Holmes. Even after the economy turned around, Chuck found that individuals and businesses repaired things instead of replacing them, so his services were always in demand. Ben suggested they form a partnership and call it House & Holmes Facilities Management. As House & Holmes began operating, they experienced several different scenarios:
Stop Payment on a Check:
Although corporate clients paid by check or electronic transfers, Chuck preferred that individuals pay with cash. A new residential customer paid for some electrical work with a check for $225, made payable to House & Holmes. Chuck took the check to the bank the next afternoon and was informed that the customer’s bank issued a stop payment on the check.
Window Problems:
House & Holmes received a large contract from a condo association to replace all of the windows in the building. Chuck ordered 75 windows from a wholesale dealer. The dealer came out to measure for the windows. Since the windows were specially ordered, Chuck paid for the entire shipment when placing the order. The windows arrived three weeks later; however, two windows were shattered and three windows were missing. As they were installing the windows, two windows did not fit.
Kitchen Package:
Chuck enjoyed getting deals on materials. A kitchen supply company offered to sell House & Holmes all of their custom floor model kitchens in its Tampa showroom. The parties agreed on a price of $15,000 for the six models, each complete with custom wood cabinets, hardware, islands, lighting and appliances. Since House & Holmes receives a significant amount of kitchen remodeling jobs, Chuck thought this was a great deal. Chuck and the seller entered into an oral contract whereby Chuck would pay the seller $ 1,500 as a down payment and the remainder when the goods were delivered. In anticipation of receipt of the kitchens, Chuck lined up two complete kitchen remodeling jobs. Chuck was able to offer the customers a great deal because of the deal he received from the kitchen supply company. When time came for delivery of the custom floor model kitchens, the seller said that it already sold the appliances to another company.
Hot Water:
Chuck and Ben installed three new hot water heaters manufactured by Bradford White for three residents in one of the condominium complexes where they had contracts for maintenance services. Extensive warnings were provided on the water heater itself and in the manual Chuck provided to the residents at the time of installation. The warning on the water heater read “CAUTION: Hot water increases the risk of scalding injury.” The heater itself contained a picture of hot water coming from a faucet with the words “DANGER” printed above it. In addition, the water heater had a statement on it:
Warning! Water temperature over 130°F can cause severe burns instantly or death from scalds. Children, disabled, and elderly are at highest risk of being scalded. Feel water temperature before bathing or showering. Temperature limiting valves are available, see manual.
Chuck set the temperature on each tank at 120°F. The next day, 90 year old Margaret slipped and fell when trying to get out of the tub because the water was too hot. Margaret received second degree burns and broke her hip when she fell.
Sara started to fill the tub to give her grandson, Gabe, a bath. When the phone rang, Sara left Gabe alone in the bathtub with the water running. Gabe was scalded by the water from the tap.
Margaret and Sara filed a lawsuit against Chuck, Ben, House & Holmes and Bradford White, alleging defects in the design of the water heater and Chuck and Ben’s failure to warn them about the heater’s dangers.
Assignment
Based on the different situations described in the scenario, create a 5 to 8-page Microsoft Word document that includes the answers to the following:
Support your answers with appropriate research, reasoning, cases, laws, and other relevant examples.
Submit the paper in APA format and properly cite sources on a separate page using APA.
Submission Details
Name your document SU_BUS3055_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your document to the W3: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Saturday, April 25, 2015.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria |
Maximum Points |
Analyzed types of business organizations Chuck and Ben could operate. Selected one type of organization and provided support for the choice. |
30 |
Analyzed Chuck’s options related to the stop payment on the customer’s check. |
20 |
Evaluated remedies for the damaged, undelivered and incorrect-sized windows. Report thoroughly explained options based on the scenario. |
30 |
Evaluated Chuck’s rights and remedies related to the kitchen floor model packages. |
20 |
Analyzed the liability of each party and the probable outcome in the product liability lawsuit. |
30 |
Assessed potential ethical issues. |
10 |
Justified suggestions to prevent future occurrences of the legal and ethical issues identified in the dilemma. |
20 |
Written components |
40 |
Total: |
200 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more