The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
The topic for the 3rd individual paper is your personal group experience in this class. You must describe the effectiveness of your group using topics discussed in Organizational Behavior. Using topics of team effectiveness, group formation, diversity, trust, conflict, decision-making, emotion, negotiation, groupthink, etc., please describe the ways that your team functioned well together, as well as ways that it did not function well. Use as many or as few of these topics as you feel are appropriate for your group’s situation. If there are other subjects from the course which you feel are important please include them.
You must cite at least 2 references. You may cite the course textbook, but that will not count towards the two required citations. The references that you cite may be any of the assigned readings (e.g. Jehn et al, 1999) or any other references that you choose. At least one of the references must be an academic paper. (Academic papers are not “web” resources. You might access them as PDFs posted online, but they are published by a journal, similar to a book or magazine.)
3 pages plus references.
Be sure to answer in your own words using ideas and illustrations from both sources.
Your paper must be formatted as follows: 12pt font, 1 inch margins, double-spaced, three pages max. To receive credit you must answer the corresponding questions using materials from the course, including the textbook, lecture notes, assigned readings and videos. Papers must clearly identify the author. Papers will be graded on: understanding of course material, logic, organization and readability (including: spelling, grammar and punctuation), and use of references. A references (works cited) section must be included. You may use either AMA or MLA format. At least one academic paper must be cited.
and here is an example of an of our work:
Group Paper #1
Group 10 consists of Carlos Recinos, Cong (Mike) Nguyen, Waheeb Kabli, Greg Bernd, and Lia Ravelo. After introducing ourselves we learned some interesting facts about each other based on the following icebreakers: 1. If you were a food, what kind would you be? 2. What actor/actress would you want to play you in a movie? 3. Where do you see yourself in ten years?
After the fun and games were over, we moved on to the “serious stuff” and learned a little about our work background and majors:
The group immediately found an interesting topic for the case analysis and unanimously agreed it is the perfect subject for us to focus on. Greg suggested using the corporate structure/culture of Valve, a highly successful software studio. What makes the company unique is a complete lack of hierarchy; no one is anyone’s “Boss”. Annual reviews and raises are handled by peer-review, and each member of Valve chooses what project they want to work on (their desks have wheels figuratively and literally). They share the task of running the company, but also share in the total profits. They also highly emphasize hiring talented people. They like to hire what they call “T-shaped people”, which is to say associates who have broad knowledge of the basics of many disciplines, with a mastery in one particular specialization.
Our gorup universally agrees that inequality in the amount of work done in team assignments is often a problem. Another is trying to create a cohesive voice for the final product that remains true to the work of each individual. Our goal as a group is to do well in the class and make sure all the work is done on time. We also want to make sure that everyone contributes equally, while maintaining a consistency throughout projects. A method that has worked in the past for some of us is some members of the group find sources, condense relevant information, and create the citation entries. Then one or two writers take the information and write the paper itself. Another possible solution is meeting at a lab and jointly writing the paper.
We agreed to identify ourselves as Majestic Hippos Inc. As a team we agreed that the five adjectives best describing our ideal group this semester are: Communicative, fair, dedicated, imaginable, and responsible.
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more