The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
Criteria for Evaluating Written Assignments
Meets Expectations
Partially Meets Expectations
Fails to Meet Expectations
Points Earned
Intellectual Understanding
(20 Points)
Addresses all aspects of assignment in sufficient depth
Addresses most aspects of assignment in sufficient depth
Does not address most aspects of assignment and/or fails to do so in sufficient depth
Creativity
(20 Points)
Analyzes and discusses many negotiation concepts by extending and elaborating with realistic examples
Discusses with some analysis several negotiation concepts by extending and elaborating with realistic examples
Does not discuss negotiation concepts or apply them to realistic examples
Insight
(20 Points)
Exhibits a substantive and perceptive ability in analyzing and discussion negotiation topic that is the focus of the paper
Discusses assignment topic with some substance and evidence of perceptive ability
Does not exhibit perceptive ability in discussing the assignment topic
Validity
(20 Points)
The majority of opinions and analyses are rigorously supported by appropriate research.
Some opinions are supported by appropriate research but much is not supported
The majority of opinions and analysis is not supported by appropriate research
Intellectual Honesty
(20 Points)
All references are acknowledged and properly cited in APA format
Some references are acknowledged and properly cited in APA format
References are not properly acknowledged and cited and/or do not conform to APA format
Organization and Style
(30 Points)
Introduction – Central theme/purpose is clearly identifiable and well developed; introductory comments provide sufficient background on the topic and preview major points
Introduction – Either the central theme/purpose is clearly identifiable and well developed; or the introductory comments provide sufficient background on the topic and preview major points, but not both
Introduction – Central theme/purpose is not clearly identifiable nor well developed; introductory comments do not provide sufficient background on the topic nor preview major points
Conclusion and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper and bring closure to the paper
Conclusion and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper but rather than bringing closure to the paper, it merely summarizes what has been previously stated
Conclusion and recommendations do not follow logically from the body of the paper nor do they bring closure to the paper
Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme of the paper
The majority of the subsequent sections develop/support the central theme of the paper
Subsequent sections do not develop/support the central theme of the paper
Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow; smooth transition between paragraphs which help maintain the flow of thought
Usually the structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow, with smooth transitions between paragraphs to help maintain the flow of thought
Sometimes the structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow; seldom includes smooth transitions between paragraphs to help maintain the flow of thought
Meets minimum assigned length
Does not meet minimum assigned length
No major errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar
Numerous errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar
Paper is laid out effectively – uses headings and other reader-friendly tools
Paper is laid out effectively, but could make better use of headings and other reader-friendly tools
Paper is not laid out effectively; fails to use headings and other reader–friendly tools
Paper is professional in appearance and demonstrates attention to detail; tone of voice is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment
Paper is professional in appearance and demonstrates attention to detail; but tone of voice is inappropriate to the audience, content, and assignment
Paper is not professional in appearance and demonstrates a lack of attention to detail; tone of voice is inappropriate to the audience, content, and assignment
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more