Use instructor feedback you have received for each component from your written proposal to create a presentation of your program evaluation. The presentation should be professional and something you would present to stakeholders. Your presentation should include all aspects of the program evaluation, including the policy brief. You will record yourself given your presentation. The presentation should be recorded 10-15 minutes or presented in class. We recommend using loom to record your video. Once recorded, upload a document with a link to your presentation.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Program Evaluation

40 points

Criteria Description

Program Evaluation

5. Target

40 points

Program evaluation is comprehensively presented. All aspects of the program evaluation are clearly and fully addressed.

4. Acceptable

34.8 points

Program evaluation is clearly presented. All aspects of the program evaluation are addressed.

3. Approaching

31.6 points

Program evaluation is presented with appropriate clarity. Most aspects of the program evaluation are addressed fully. Some details are lacking.

2. Insufficient

29.6 points

Program evaluation is not clearly presented. Some aspects of the program evaluation are missing or poorly described.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Program evaluation is not clearly identified, and subconcepts do not consistently branch from the main idea.

Research

30 points

Criteria Description

Research

5. Target

30 points

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

4. Acceptable

26.1 points

Research is timely and relevant and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

3. Approaching

23.7 points

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.

2. Insufficient

22.2 points

Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No outside sources were used to support the assignment.

Visual Appeal

30 points

Criteria Description

Visual Appeal

5. Target

30 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

4. Acceptable

26.1 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

3. Approaching

23.7 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.

2. Insufficient

22.2 points

Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.

Presentation

40 points

Criteria Description

Presentation

5. Target

40 points

The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts. Presentation meets the 10-15-minute requirement.

4. Acceptable

34.8 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements. Presentation meets the 10-15-minute requirement.

3. Approaching

31.6 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements. Presentation meets the 10-15-minute requirement.

2. Insufficient

29.6 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements. Presentation may be less than the 10-15-minute requirement.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

Synthesis

20 points

Criteria Description

Synthesis

5. Target

20 points

Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.

4. Acceptable

17.4 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.

3. Approaching

15.8 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not fully form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical or verifiable.

Mechanics of Writing

20 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Target

20 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable

17.4 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Approaching

15.8 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

20 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Target

20 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable

17.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

15.8 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

14.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.