The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Book/movie review
22/08/2022
READ READ BELOW! I NEED QUALITY WORK THAT ADDRESSES EVERYTHING
Using this information, the Assignment Rubric and the additional resources provided below, develop a 3-5 page (not including title and reference pages) APA formatted paper in a word document such as Microsoft Word. A minimum of 3 outside references must be used. MUST BE APA format
Select an organization that you have a solid working knowledge of (an employer past or present is recommended) and conduct a SWOT analysis for that organization. Once you identify the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, you should then develop a strategic HRM plan to address one of the identified issues.
Organization is Mount Sinai Hospital of Manhattan in NYC so do SWOT ANALYSIS OF THIS HOSPITAL
AS A WHOLE! and answer the questions about the organization
USE THIS LINK TO ADDRESS ALL and the grading system below
https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/swot-analysis-how-to-do-it.html
Each writing assignment is worth a total of 100 points. Please see the grading rubric below for additional detail and feedback on performance.
Limited
Marginal
0 to 3 points
Limited-to-no use of APA guidelines: Paper is missing key elements of an APA formatted paper such as: Title page, in- text citations, References page. Format errors are significant and demonstrate no attempt to follow APA guidelines.
4 to 8 points
Followed some APA guidelines: A few significant citation and/or referencing errors (e.g. separating the author and year when citing, omitting a reference title, journal name, publisher, or year, or parts of the reference are out of order. Student makes attempts at APA format for all areas of the paper. Attempt may contain errors but does not hinder the readability of the paper.
9 to 10 points
Followed APA guidelines: Title page contain perfect or near perfect APA format. In-text citation contain perfect or near perfect APA format. APA citations with no more than minor errors such as including first initials, using “and†rather than & in a parenthetical citation, and using et al. in the first citation with 3- 5 authors. Reference page contains perfect or minimum APA references errors. Puts exact words of authors in quotation marks with name, year, and page number included. Spacing is used correctly for references and paper structure.
Mechanics (free of grammatical, spelling and/or typographical errors, thoughts well-articulated and clearly presented)
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization
Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized
Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized
Focus of Topic
Lacks clear focus or topic. Missing support and analysis of issue.
16 to 29 points
Focus is somewhat clear and connects to the established topic. Submission lacks clear analysis or support to fully examine the scope of the required assignment.
30 to 35 points
Submission has an intentional focus relevant to the area of study: Focus is clear and well-established throughout the paper. Supporting research is synthesized and used appropriately to establish relevance and support within the paper. In-depth discussion and analysis of the topic are provided.
Depth of analysis, critical thinking and originality of thought
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument
Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective
Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective
Made no connections. Lacked any elaboration.
4 to 6 points
Marginal connections: Made some connections. Minimal elaboration.
7 to 10 points
Integrated new knowledge with prior knowledge and extended or related it to conditions within an organization or system: Made connections with current practice, prior knowledge, or other professional experiences. Made connections with relevant ideas and issues applicable to professional settings.
The writer is very fast, professional and responded to the review request fast also. Thank you.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more